Форум гитаристов

Processing
The FM3 is powered by a 3-Core “Griffin” DSP with one ARM and two SHARC+ cores providing superior power in a compact format. The dedicated graphics processor allows the main DSPs to be focused on critical audio tasks. Cab modeling runs in an accelerator. Amp modeling runs on the 2nd core DSP.

"The processing power of an FM-3 is roughly the same as an AX-8." source
"It's not nearly as powerful as an Axe-Fx III but it's a cool little unit." source
"The FM3 is not as powerful as an Axe-Fx III. The Axe-Fx III has at least four times the processing power." source
"Uses an SC587. The SHARC+ core has essentially the same MFLOPs as the SHARC. The overall processing power is greater than an AX-8 because of the ARM which offloads all the housekeeping stuff, USB, etc." source
"(subject to change) We dedicate a core to the Amp and to Reverbs. Due to CPU limitations and not wanting to reduce Amp quality you can run 2 of the following 3 in a preset ( Amp, Rev1, Rev2 )." source
"It will support all the reverb types of Axe-FX3. You won't have to use spring reverbs to save CPU since the core can run the Amp and 1 reverb, and all the other blocks are on the other core." source
”The FM3's CPU utilization meters are normalized so that 100% represents the amount of the CPU that can be allocated to audio processing. So you can go right up to 100%. However, if you ever cross 100% things will get shut off without your consent so you still need to be careful.” source
(comparing the amp modeling to the Axe-Fx III) "They are the same quality. Certain features were removed to allow the algorithms to run including the bias tremolo, input dynamics processing, and several other inauthentic enhancements." source
"We removed all the superfluous stuff (bias tremolo, dynamic presence/depth, etc.) in order to get the core amp modeling to run on the slower processor." source
"The Axe-Fx III contains various algorithms that allow you to enhance the amp modeling that don't exist on a real amp. I.e. dynamic presence/depth, input dynamic processing, etc. These were removed to allow the core amp modeling to run on the lower-powered processor." source
(Cab block runs on CPU accelerator) "It's a CPU accelerator thing. A second Cab block would use a lot more than 3%." source
"FM3 CPU is normalized so it's tricky to get an apples to apples meter comparison with A3 for that reason among others." source
"FM3 has an additional core to handle UI/Midi/Footcontoller stuff so that freed up some CPU. We also moved the reverbs to the 2nd Sharc core with the Amp which freed up a lot of CPU for other blocks (Reverb uses a lot). Additionally a bunch of little optimizations you find while working in the code for a long time. 1% here, 1% there adds up." source
"(...) The DSP power makes it the second most powerful amp modeling product on the market behind only the Axe-Fx III. Adding another DSP would increase the price substantially. The increase would be more than the price of just the DSP since larger power supplies would be required, etc. This would price the unit above our target price." source
"The FM3 DSP is three cores and also supports floating-point, has dual DDR3 memory busses, hardware FFT and FIR accelerators, etc."source

oh my God, когда же его выпустят в открытую продажу?!!!...

Не думаю, что он будет сильно отличаться от своего настольного/рэкового варианта. Там же ж многоядерного нет ничего, эффекты там поскольку-постольку, качество усилков/эффектов выбирать не надо, а вместе с этим - сложных цепочек построения звука.